You May Also Like

About the Author: Oren Garnes


  1. Why are people afraid of transparency? If there was proof of a candidate giving away secret info, I would want to hear of it also! If your'e "clean", You've got no dog in this fight! Trump just likes the opposition pissing all over themselves!

  2. But what Trump said he would do was exactly what Hillary and the Democrats did in 2016, except it wasn't from an ally, but a foreign enemy, and it was completely unsubstantiated information. Trump talks about wrongdoing, crimebreaking. As President he would be obligated to report any crimes to the FBI that is a threat to national security or even just illegal in terms of U.S. laws.

  3. God how I would love to see a banner scroll across the bottom of the screen that says, โ€œNeil, go to commercial and head to payroll to pick up your last check! โ€œ

  4. As to Towering over Trump…. Notice Trump is almost Georgeโ€™s height while sitting as George is while standing…..LOL! If Trump stood up it would look like he was speaking with a 12 year old….a short 12 year old boy! LOL

  5. Trump again traps the DEMS to backfire them what DEMS have done in 2016 elections – , … his comments simply meant to expose in his own style what DEMS have done in 2016 elections, wherein, Obama/Hillary colluded with foreign Intels to set up Russia hoax to take down Trump interfere in the 2016 elections, ……. now DEMS shout for treason by Trump but the same DEMS ignore to accept the same treason act by DEMS/Obama/Hillary funding Steele dossier … FISA abuse scandal to spy on Trump during candidacy as well as his Presidency …… Hypocrite Deamonrats

  6. Pelosi I have a message for you!!!! Trump answered a hypothetical question ONLY nothing more than that. You don't have two brain cells between your ears!!!! You're an absolute disaster no question!! Take a look at your own party and while you're at it look in the mirror and see for yourself that you are wrong about Trump!! What's acceptable during the Obama Administration is okay in the Trump Administration!!! Get it!! Stop investigating the investigations and do your job for once!!

  7. Someone should tell Pelosis,the President is very honest!! He did not lie,no harm in listening!! At least he would not pay for a false dossier like the Democrats did!!!!!!!!! And then push a witch hunt investigation for two years like the Democrats did!!!!!!Democrats are corrupt and hipocratical!!!!!!!!!!

  8. Pres Clinton gives 11 speeches in Russia @ $500,000 each; Hellary approves Uranium One deal; Russia pays millions $$ to Clinton foundation; Hellary pays for Steele Dossier; Ukraine admits to giving Clinton campaign false information on Trump; all while Hellary Clinton is Secretary of State. Of course, the MSM led Dems have no problem with any of these infractions.
    This is all a distraction from the Barr investigation that will likely send many liberals to prison. At the very least, the investigation results will force multiple political retirements on the Left.

  9. Altogether peculiar. Not one Democrat has even spoken about the origins of the dossier. It seems no one wants to be suicided. Maybe thatโ€™s why they pick on Trump because he wonโ€™t OFF them lolz

  10. STEELE DOSSIER…… compiled by RUSSIANS……… disseminated by the BRITISH…….. accepted and used by FBI to obtain FISA warrants.

  11. Can we get anymore stupid as a country….I mean 2016 wasn't enough that showed how many critical thinkers we don't have….Sad….

  12. What the hell do these spouting pundits think that the CIA and other 16 Intelligence Agencies in the United States do all the time? They gather information, both willingly and unwillingly, from foreign governments all the time, AND they share that information with the administration ALL THE TIME. Total bunch of morons and hypocrites. Trump was just stating an obvious fact.

  13. Trump is setting up the DNC……BUT the media dont get it……stupid Pelosi and the rest of the DNC…….don't believe me. Watch and see ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

  14. All this hysteria makes me laugh. There are no politicians out there that would refuse to listen to dirt offered about an opponent. Who ever says otherwise still believe in the Easter Bunny. That is the same as telling a third party that they do not want to hear about the cost structure of a competitor.

  15. oh the HYPOCRISY . am i the only one to realize that this event has already happened? it is called the "Steele dossier". the DEMOCRATS are the responsible party. where is the outrage on THAT issue? you people all just got played by a better actor that jussie smollett

  16. Why does this dude always sound like heโ€™s got a huge loog stuck in he back of his throat?

  17. Oh, please. Trump gets flak for misspellings in his tweets, how many scoops of ice cream he eats, how he feeds fish, how he descends stairs, the color of his skin, the way he combs his hair, and any straw at which the globalists tell their minions to grasp. This is more of the same nonsense.

  18. Neil just isn't good for America. We need someone willing to stand up for the truth. He's just another RINO type person. He's always trying to undermine that which is best for the regular people and trying to help the establishment and never-trumpers.

  19. FFS. how would anyone know what someone was going to tell them ontil it happens.
    Document it.
    Report it to your advisors.
    Confirm the appropriate action.
    Take the apropriate action.
    End of story.

  20. What that fatty demrat on the middle is twisting her face all the time like trying to smile ? ๐Ÿ˜‚

  21. One thing Schlapp forgot to mention is that, all those countries that we have been influenced for several decades are unstable politically. By making it "Ok" for Republicans and Democrats to accept foreign helps to affect our elections, we are going down the road of instability instead of being the best in the world.

  22. It os not a crime to listen to anyone saying they have information on your opponent. Depending on the information and its nature will determine who you go to with it. It is only a crime if you use it in a election to malign your opponent.

  23. So are you saying it's okay to go to a foreign entity and solicit opposition research but not okay to let them come to you on their own . Because that is what happened is it not.

  24. Hey Nervous Nancy want to hear the nicest thing I have to say to & or about you. Can't do it here I may be banned for life, so it's not very nice & it would be better if you covered your ears.

  25. Since when, in a free country, do we police what people are allowed to LISTEN TO? ? ? ? ? What kind FASCIST MENTALITY do these Demonic Swamp-Rat Rat-Bastard Democrats have ? ? ?

  26. Poor Neil. Always was a Trump hater. He should apply for a spot with CNN fake news. His selective memory would fit right in.

  27. Wow, the democrats are completely stupid!!! Do they SERIOUSLY think of someone told them information that the president should say โ€œNOOOO!!! STOP!!! DONT TELL ME!!! La la la la la!! IM NOT LISTENING!!!โ€ ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ. I mean, if a head of state of another country tells you some information on someone, the ADULT THING TO DO would be to listen to what they say, express concern or understanding and if the information is alarming or in any way warrants alarm or concern, you would turn that information over to the FBI…. if it was idly silly gossip you would say โ€œwell I could of lives the rest of my life without that nonsenseโ€… but still, you would hear what a โ€œrespected head of stateโ€ would tell you, than take information and report it.. I mean, the democrats are outraged over a hypothetical, why are the democrats NOT upset over actual spying and dirt creating democrats who actually committed TREASONOUS BEHAVIOR???? FFS these democrats are MORONS!!!! ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™€๏ธ. I personally think President Trump just โ€œtrumpedโ€ the democrats!! He held up a huge mirror to their criminal activists ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ. LOVE OUR PRESIDENT TRUMP!!! ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

  28. A nothing ๐Ÿ” burger! Now to the real news…fake news assume they can read minds. The people are tired of media hoaxes and dims conspiracy theories. Coward Mueller wouldn't take questions

  29. The Dems-Rats & Fake News Media would rather see the United States fail than see The President Trump or the Republican Party succeed. Sad!!!! Trump 2020 * KAG *

  30. President Trump will(if he has not already) receive credible Intel on Joe Biden's as well as Nancy Pelosi's husband's 100's of $Millions of connections to China's dictatorship!
    For the security of the American people and of all democratic free nations The President absolutely must "take" this intel!

  31. What i find suspicious is that the republicans have a wait and see attitude , they found already enough evidence to come in action . It looks that they only appear on television when they have to comment about what the Dems are doing, but don't show any counterattacks against all matters which are directly targetting our President. Why the republicans do not act in the way they should have, where are their HEARINGS ? Where are their INVESTIGATIONS ? Where is their SPECIAL COUNSEL ?ย  Everybody can read in the unredacted parts of the available Fisa documents some facts which unveil an unethical and unlawfull behavior by the Fisacourt itself . All the evidence wich already came out is enough for severalmentities indictments. Why not filing lawsuits against these entities to obtain information, why they wait for Tom Fitton from jurisdicial watch to do so. Now why the republicans do not come in action , their attitude is almost suspicious behavior !!

  32. This is the trouble with journalists today, twisting comments to make something out of nothing. We all know what the President meant when he said it and he said nothing wrong. If he hears something wrong, he will report it to the F.B.I. BUNCH OF JERKS ! We love our President Trump and nothing that they say will ever change that.

  33. I support President Trump on this one, here's why….
    Here's a prime example : If DHS received information from a reliable source, let's just say for instance a defector or intel spy of Iran's National Guard. Warning our CIA that the Iranians have infiltrated or hacked our government's computer networking system. What idiot wouldn't take this information seriously, and at least have the proper authorities look into it, to find out whether it's true or not…
    As far as those that don't understand or don't agree with our president you must be either dumb or just don't understand, why good or bad information may or not have a changing profound effect on future or current events in the context personally, socially, economically, and even politically.

  34. Trump said he'd listen to the information and contact the FBI if there's anything wrong. He didn't say he'd use the information.

  35. When is fox going put some men on there network. Because I am tired of lessing to winning like girls like Neil.

  36. So Pelosi defends her Party from accusations of talking with and listening to comments with foreign world leaders. Call her in front of the Senate Hearing to explain Hildabeast and Steele.

  37. Neil is an IDIOT, what in the hell do you think the Satanic Socialist Dumbocraps have been doing for YEARS! Semper Fi.


  39. What is he supposed to do, say, sorry I have to block my ears, I cannot listen to what you are saying????

  40. It's a great thing McConnell just did, to shut down consideration of a law specifically to address this issue. What a great Republitard patriot!

  41. If Pelosi thinks Trump doesn't know right from wrong, because he supposedly sought to do what Hilary in fact did do, yet she does not believe Clinton does not for that very reason not know the difference of right from wrong, does it not follow by the same reasoning that Pelosi herself does not know the difference between right and wrong?

  42. I want to know what Obama, HRC, Podesta, Pelosi and Kerry have been up to in their travels and would be prepared to listen listen to anyone who has information on their treachery.

  43. As if Hellary squinton didn't do it. lmfao ( oh my they're just not used to having a honest president) ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

  44. It spoils my day when I have to see these toxic Democrats whining about the same thing , they didn't even hear Mueller and what he said about the result of the Russian Dossier hoax . Like children they said " I fI stick my fingers in my ears it wont have happened ."

  45. I really don't care anymore what Trump does. Let him do whatever he wants. Just as long as it's alright for future presidents to do everything he does, republican or democrat. The rule of law, the Constitution? Too astringent! Le's all live on the fringes!

  46. Wow! This segment clearly shows the Republican tendency to bend and break laws to suit their purposes! The New Republican/Trump Party are hypocrites! Republicans are still calling an apple an orange! Excuses, excuses…"What if…" and "I know you are, but what am I" is not a policy to be proud of!

  47. It's not the information that's illegal morons!! It's how you come to receive or acquire it!! A foreign nation covertly influencing their way into an American election by corrupting an ignorant asset (Don jr) is far different than hiring and PAYING a publicly accessible company to research and investigate an opponent. Let's not forget that the Steel Dossier was initiated by Marco Rubio during the Republican Primary, used to gather dirt on Trump by Rubio! Clinton simply picked up that info from where Rubio left off. Nobody is screaming about Marco Rubio from the Republican side. Funds that were used to pay for this information by a campaign are then disclosed within the expenditures of that campaign. They are not kept secret and vulnerable to corruption/blackmail by Russian spy's! Espionage 101…

  48. Adam Schiff actually took a call from Russia, he didn't know he was on the radio, and wanted to know what kind of dirt, and MSNBC never said a word about it, so the president being the chief law enforcement officer has to laugh at these clowns, because Schiff didn't know it was a prank.

  49. It's not Trump's disregard for the law that truly disturbs the people, even his most ardent supporters.ย 

    It is what guides him above all else, what he finally made in a clear statement for those of us that did not see it before. In his statement regarding contacting the FBI if approached again with stolen "Op Research" Trump made it clear to all. We all knew he was a lier, and a cheat, most knew he had little regard for the law, but most of us thought that when it really mattered he would put the country above his self interests. The statement he made put unrepairable cracks in that belief deep within his base, and it shattered it for everyone else.ย  Even when it matters, when you must stand for your country and home, he can not be trusted to do so. That that is how deep his flaws run, all the way to that unacceptable depth.ย  Trump comes before country, even when it counts.

    In his mind it always has, always will, he just explained so the followers could now understand it.

  50. Trump wants only to win. As with his private businesses, the means, legal or corrupt doesn't matter. Just win. He'll sacrifice the nation to further his empire because he has no patriotic home. He will place his spoiled royal family before everything else including the welfare and security of the US. His base is slowly realizing this ugly fact and the grave mistake they made in 2016.

  51. Shut up Cavuto and Capri ๐Ÿ™ Stop twisting his words ๐Ÿ™ Let Matt Schlapp Finish . I mute Cavuto and Capri won't listen to either one ๐Ÿ™ Every word of President Trump is either distorted, twisted or leave out the most important parts of what he says ๐Ÿ™ You people are a Disgrace and a part of the Swamp and Fake News and sure hope President Trump succeeds at what he's doing . He the most honest and open of everyone ๐Ÿ™‚

  52. Nancy Pelosi as the rest of the Democrats and the media are not over the target

    The English language is very precise but if someone wants to cut and paste what someone says then it is very easy to make a positive statement a negative statement. Here is the media, in action, doing exactly that. The interviewer asks a valid question as follows โ€œIf your campainge, this time round, if foreigners, if Russia, nโ€™ China or someone else, offers you information on an opponent would you accept it or call the FBIโ€

    The Presidents response โ€œโ€ I think, maybe, you would do both. I think, maybe, you would want to listen. I know there is nothing wrong with listening. If somebody called from a country, Norway, we have information on your opponent. Oh I think I would want to hear itโ€โ€

    The whole of the anti Trump media seizes on the response with glee. He would take dirt from Russia.

    However, nothing in the words spoken by President Trump show or prove that he would proceed further than listening or informing the FBI. He did not say he would accept.

    What if the information was coming from MI5 or MI6 that the Democrats campainge was getting information from a ex British Spy by the name of Christopher Steele, specifically to illegally undermine their opponents campainge. Would the President listen, not listen, act on it, or not act it, or simply hand it over to the corrupt law enforcement run by the deep state.

    What if indeed the information was coming from Russia. Would listening be constructive or un-constructive. Would listening determine if an opponent was an ISIS sympathizer or be the head of a corrupt administration.

    From the comments below many are from youths with their foreskins pulled over their heads, products of the Anti Social Media Brigade

  53. Trump just exposed HRC paying for the dossier and exposing the dems and deep state including msm et all. Trump 2020 ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *