Lindsey Graham on calls for witnesses in impeachment trial

Lindsey Graham on calls for witnesses in impeachment trial


You May Also Like

About the Author: Oren Garnes

100 Comments

  1. “You’re quite right but he can’t encore executive privilege right?”

    Sen. Graham: “no, you’re wrong, he can”

    “But but but”

    Graham: “wrong again, you know nothing”

  2. Hi from Canada , you Republicans better give the next Democratic president just as hard of a time for pay back . Tit for tat . I'd like that .

  3. Just switch the words "Trump" for "democrat" and all those charges and statements would be infinitely more accurate.

  4. We all know it’s rigged, get it over with. Now get also ready to be kicked out of the senate in 2020, Trump is under the protection so he will win even if an extra 15 million democrats and independents vote. That has been made clear to all of us.

  5. Good job defending our President and our nation!!! I’m proud to stand by you! A real American!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  6. cant wait , trump 2020 and skelator nancy loses the house . keep the corrupt democrats out of power
    trump 2020
    🇺🇸💪🏾🙏🏻🇺🇸💪🏾🙏🏻🇺🇸

  7. Democrats gave trump free ride.We Thank you. Just like Obama said, these people are dumb. Talking about democratic base. On a hot mic.

  8. If I knew I was innocent I would throw every witness I had to prove that I'm innocent Trump could have cleared his name in the house instead he wanted to be a dumbass about it

  9. Nanci has abused power and the Constitution….it is her Great Blunder…..Blundering Nanci…her hate caused her to betray America.

  10. What bothers me is what Lindsey Graham said about not having the vote for immediate dismissal. That leads me to believe there’s some RINOS out there that might be causing problems

  11. Lindsey says they don't have the votes to dismiss even though they have the majority and only need a simple majority vote. That shows either many republican senators are deep state or they really want to play this out and make the democrats pay by shining light on their corruption.

  12. Oh. Wallace. Wut? Oh yeah, wrong video… go to somewhere else. Please Fox, dont want to unsubscribe, but FIRE this fake DS arrogant, anti-Trump and anti-US person? 🇺🇸❤️

  13. Chris Wallace is a hack. The court has not ruled at all in this instance. The point of a court to litigate disputes on a case by case basis. In all cases precedences are determined by the actual judge presiding over the court not unqualified hack journalists! Media today wants to play judge, jury and executioner. 🙄

  14. As an interested observer, i.e a non american, Wallace is so biased and obviously doesnt understand there is actually No crime. The impeachment charges do not meet high crimes.

  15. Wallace doesn't understand the case for impeachment was built on a weak foundation. The problem is no crime has been committed. President Trump was denied executive privilege and charged with obstructing Congress. The President was denied due process. I would think after impeachment in the house. The articles should stand on their own merits. The only thing left is for the Senate to review the articles and make a determination.

  16. WOW I'M SO GLAD THAT THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO SAY WE DID NOT KNOW ABOUT THE TRASH WE WERE PROTECTING AND COVERING THE SMELL OF IT UP LMAO KEEP TAKING MORONS HISTORY NEEDS YOUR EVERY WORD !

  17. Trump has been obstructionist since muller. 10 recorded so far. That was called executive privilege too. Graham doesn't want witnesses because parnas scared him explains his media blitz.

  18. DEMOCRATS WANNA REMOVE OUR PRESIDENT BECAUSE DNC USED UKRAINE TO HELP GET CLINTON ELECTED AND USED UKRAINE AS A MONEY LAUNDERING SCHEME….EVERYONE KNOWS THIS…OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS COMPROMISED DUH

  19. Darth Wallace needs to be removed and Graham saying Pelosi is a very religious person, yeah devil worship counts as a religion!

  20. This is a sham because these people, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler and Chuck Schumer hate the president. They think they are above the law.

  21. How about they hold the witness hearings in secret and only leak the parts they like? Would that fly with Democrats?

  22. I hear they're not even going to justify these bogus articles with a trial. They're just going to declare it nonsense and dismiss it pretty quickly. That's the best strategy even if you do want to put people on blast and expose their shenanigans. However, democrats may claim some kind of nonsense over this and perhaps they should be given the left and the right in proper showboat fashion.

  23. graham is campaigning for donny bone spurs job, as lying Comrade in thief. Looks like putin has 2 bitches in wash." I don't care do you"?

  24. I just don’t get why people hate trump if he is trying to build the country what does it matter he is good or not no one will have perfect president you don’t want president just talking I’ll do this and that and never do anything I admire trump and I’m middle eastern so not sure why people hate someone who is doing better then previews and when trump is gone people will say oh trump was much better even trump said saddam was better then what they have now in Iraq and Iran if saddam was around and trump was president I bet he would have made deal with saddam that he can’t refuse and then everyone happy saddam was an issue but he could have been fixed the only thing is bush family had personal issue with saddam and didn’t wanna give them any chance of negotiating just straight war for no reason and that’s why Iran have influence in Iraq and that’s why most of Middle East is a big mess maybe I’m wrong I don’t know but you don’t just bomb a country before there is some type of negotiations and that’s what bush family did they destroyed Iraq but left Iran alone ? They were scared of Iran wel trump just called Iran bluff about being powerful and they aren’t. Powerful at all they are broke as hell cant afford anything their economy is garbage the only thing they have is oil and if USA stop it Iran is done they will have no weapons nothing anyways that’s my opinion and I think things could have been better if trump was a president in the years of 2000 and up

  25. Will Palosi, Schiff and Basket pay back the wasted millions on bs impeachment….& let's not forget Russian collusion farce?

  26. Chris Wallace is an idiot.
    He says that the precedent over executive privilege is valid here. It 'May' be in a criminal case, but this isn't a criminal case. There's No crime. After 3 yrs…still no crime. Just a never-ending partisan circus.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *