Google and Amazon are now in the oil business

Google and Amazon are now in the oil business


On Earth Day 2019, Google posted this video
about the “urgency of radically addressing climate change in the next decade.” This is
Kate Brandt, she used to be Obama’s chief sustainability officer. Now she works to make
Google a global leader in “reducing or even eliminating our dependence on raw materials
or fossil fuels.” Google’s growing data centers need more energy every year. In 2012 just
34% of that power came from renewables. But by 2017, they got that up to 100 percent.
They’ve also managed to lower their total energy use with some help from a branch of
artificial intelligence called machine learning. A computer program takes in lots of data and
trains itself to operate the centers as efficiently as possible. Here’s energy use under human
supervision, and when the AI is in charge. The more data the AI trains on, the better
it gets at reducing energy use. But here’s the thing: This same technology can be used
to automate lots of other tasks, like fossil fuel discovery and extraction. And while Google
is using AI to increase the efficiency of its operation, it’s also using it to try and
get as much oil and gas out of the ground as possible. In 2018, Google hired Darryl
Willis, a veteran of British Petroleum, to lead its new oil, gas, and energy division.
Willis explained “our plan is to be the partner of choice for the energy industry.” They’ve
already signed a deal with Total, one of the world’s biggest oil companies, to develop
AI that will streamline oil and gas exploration and production. And Google’s not alone. Microsoft
and Amazon are also teaming up with the fossil fuel industry. Big Tech has entered the oil
business. On June 15, 1957, the citizens of Tulsa, Oklahoma buried a rather odd time capsule,
a brand new Plymouth Belvedere. Sealed inside among commemorative plates, ash trays, t-shirts,
and books that captured the spirit of the times, was a 16mm film reel. It showed a martian
visiting the United States and learning that oil and competition made the nation prosper.
Also included in the capsule were gasoline and motor oil. In 1957, it seemed like a very real
possibility that these products wouldn’t be around in 50 years when the Belvedere was
scheduled to be disinterred. Newspapers around the country were reporting that America’s
oil production would soon fall off. And as that cartoon martian learned, discoveries
of new reserves were rare. “Only one well in nine finds any oil at all. And only one
in almost a thousand makes a major discovery.” Oil has always been really hard to find. America’s
first oil well was drilled in 1859 near a particularly greasy creek in Pennsylvania.
It was obvious there was oil seeping up from the ground here, but it took Edwin Drake over
a year and all his money to find a measly little pocket of black gold. Still, his discovery
triggered an oil boom and a Pennsylvania paper was soon explaining that the substance could
“illuminate, lubricate, make candles, and cure most diseases from which humanity suffers.”
Not all of that proved true, but 100 years later, petroleum had given the world “fabrics,
toothbrushes, tires, insecticide, cosmetics, weed killers, a whole galaxy of things to
make a better life on Earth.” And of course, fuel. The energy needs of the world have risen
a lot since 1859. And from very early on there were fears that fossil fuels couldn’t meet
this demand. In 1909, some thought oil and gas would run out around 1937. In 1937, US
oil supplies were supposed to disappear by 1952. And so on, and so on, as fossil fuels
became more and more essential in every day life, predictions of a crash kept coming.
But somehow, the oil kept flowing. “I couldn’t imagine how this ever-increasing supply of
oil was achieved. Until I found out that there’s not just one but thousands of oil companies
all competing with each other to discover and develop new sources of oil.” From the
earliest days, competing companies invested in better technology to extract fossil fuels,
better drills, better pumps, and they developed better techniques for finding new oil reserves,
creating seismic vibrations to see underneath the ground, using satellite LIDAR to reveal
hidden structures, detecting subtle changes in the Earth’s gravity and magnetism. Thanks
in part to these advances, by 2007, when a very rusty Belvedere was exhumed, global oil
production was still on the rise. In the US, it did look like oil was finally petering
out, until investment in new technology, fracking and horizontal wells in vast shale formations,
brought it roaring back. Today, once again, if we just rely on current reserves and current
tech, oil production will start to falter, but if new technology lets us squeeze more
out of the reserves we already have and find new sources of oil, we’ll be able to meet
the growing demand. It’s just a matter of finding the next technological leap. Of course,
there’s a problem with using fossil fuels to meet the world’s energy needs. Climate
change. Oil, gas and coal are a time capsule of a different sort, sealing ancient carbon
deep below the Earth. When humans open that time capsule and burn those fossil fuels,
carbon reenters the atmosphere as the greenhouse gas CO2. Since 1859, CO2 levels have shot
up and so has the planet’s temperature. If we keep going like this, if we burn all the
fossil fuels we currently have access to, models suggest that the Earth could warm somewhere
between 6.4 and 9.5 degrees. And so climate activists say there’s only one thing to do.
“Keep it in the ground. Keep it in the ground. Keep it in the ground. Keep it in the ground.”
That’s easier chanted than done. Currently, the world relies on fossil fuels for 85 percent
of its energy needs. Keeping it in the ground will require a huge shift to renewables and
lower energy use in general. And big tech companies have publicly rushed to be part
of this effort. “Sustainability has been a core value since our founding.” “There had
been pockets of sustainability living within Amazon’s business since the very beginning.”
“One of the problems we can help solve is energy consumption.” “We can invent our way
out of this problem.” “Innovation is the key to solving this problem.” “We can put artificial
intelligence and digital technology to use to help our customers in every part of the
economy become more sustainable themselves.” It turns out that same artificial intelligence
technology is just what oil companies need to stay profitable. See the fossil fuel industry
has amassed lots and lots of valuable data as they’ve mapped Earth’s crust in search
of reserves. Take this patch of ocean floor in the North Sea. In 1989, Dutch geologists
painstakingly mapped the different rock layers using seismic scans. Researchers at IBM recently
fed all that seismic data into a machine learning algorithm and after about 10 minutes of training,
the AI was able to label the rock layers nearly as accurately as human experts. Another group
at Georgia Tech used machine learning to quickly identify structures important to oil discovery.
You could imagine how an AI could train itself with all kinds of data to pinpoint the best
places to drill. And once drilling begins, AI can streamline extraction to make it cheaper.
That kind of efficiency can help the oil and gas industry compete with renewables and so
it’s no surprise that they spent an estimated 1.75 billion dollars on AI in 2018. Google,
Microsoft, and Amazon are competing for a piece of that pie. Google has signed agreements
with several fossil fuel companies. Microsoft has teamed up with Exxon and Chevron, and
just hired Daryl Willis away from Google. And Amazon, who already provides cloud services
to BP and Shell is marketing its ability to accelerate and optimize exploration, drilling,
and production of oil and gas. While they talk up their commitment to sustainability,
big tech is making sure the world can keep burning plenty of fossil fuel. “And if you
have both of these things, any goal is possible. It’s destination unlimited.”

You May Also Like

About the Author: Oren Garnes

100 Comments

  1. Folks it's up to you as the individual to lower your own carbon foot print. Not Government, and Corporations will invest in whatever people spend money on. So, it's up to us.. Nothing else. Wake up

  2. With a possible iranian war taking place right now and watching this video, I fully understand the message of "Limits to Growth" (1972)

  3. Honestly it's really weird to think because I was always think of Tech companies as the new market with lots of potential and the oil one as a dying old one that is only going down so to see tech companies investing in the oil industry is very strange

  4. Hey VOX I have a video recommendation,

    What if The USSR "won" the cold war?

    I have no idea if you done this before but I was just thinking about my own theories alot and want to relate them to an actual professional news provider

  5. Although I don’t agree with the view of Vox on this issue, still I appreciate the quality of this vid, very appealing and informative, thanks Vox! Great job!

  6. O, Kmon…. they are NOT investing on them, they just have a computing platform and offers it to everyone.
    Of course, they could refuse to sell to a particular market, true, but is strange how that same moral is not applied to steel, tool, and boat manufacturers for example.
    At least the computations will be done the most efficient way possible.

  7. O, Kmon…. they are NOT investing on them, they just have a computing platform and offers it to everyone.
    Of course, they could refuse to sell to a particular market, true, but is strange how that same moral is not applied to steel, tool, and boat manufacturers for example.
    At least the computations will be done the most efficient way possible.

  8. Vox annoys me. So is the alternative supposed to be better? Let these energy companies do it without the expertise of the tech companies and risk harming the planet even more? Seriously?

  9. Oh those 50's ads gave me them sweet Fallout flashbacks.

    Speaking of Fallout, I believe that the future is in nuclear

    But hey, that's just me

  10. They the reason America not great. When you can buy peoples rights and destroy them for another dollar.. Next war they will not get far.

  11. Omg people. GO NUCLEAR! It is the safest source of energy per k/wat and it will lead to the path of fusion energy. Just don't put it where a giant earthquake and tidal wave can hit it.

  12. As bad as this is, when I first saw the title of this video I thought they meant essential oils, which would have been so much worse 😅

  13. You guys know of any clean energy source that can meet all our energy demands, thereby replacing all fossil fuels I'm all ears… In the meantime, stop complaining and asking the government and corporations to stop meeting our energy needs.

  14. Google and amazon: OIL
    Africa and mid east: 😧

    Breaking news!!! Africa and mid east epstein themselves for equality

  15. Vox finally figuring out their buddies are hypocrits. Shouldn't be a surprise since Vox are hypocrits themselves! If Vox really cared about the environment, they'd fire all their employees because they use gas to get to work, they use energy to power their computers, i mean hey editing and rendering videos takes lots of energy production. Time for you to fire everyone if you really care about the climate Vox

  16. so this is the magician and the prophet problem, the thing is that we don't see the burning elephant in Australia

  17. Having a laugh riot at all these broken-hearted people who thought the Google's and Amazon's of the world were the 'good guys' and Big Oil was the 'bad guys'. You all make this too easy for politicians.

  18. at 05:06 the graph has only lower and upper limits on X Axis ,how can we identify the year when fracking boom started?

  19. Wow it’s almost like big corporations don’t actually care about issues that will harm the environment, and inevitably human beings, and just care about making as much money as possible. Weird how that works.

  20. What’s wrong with using gigantic solar panels instead of searching oil? I mean like, we have Elon Musk smh

  21. Because world doesn't run on "positive thinking" it runs on money and electricity. And if you don't want to put most of the world back into preindustrial times you still need oil, for now at least.

  22. 6:22 Actually that is not true. There has been a silent movement towards Nuclear energy since it is more efficient than renewables and releases no green house gases into the atmosphere. If we could find a way to dispose of the waste efficiently, it would actually be the best option of the bunch!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *