?‍? Where do jobs come from? | Employment vs self-employment

?‍? Where do jobs come from? | Employment vs self-employment


Where do jobs come from? Why do all people not just work on their own? Everyone strives to make the most effective
use of their resources to meet their needs as best as they can. When you enter the labor market, you already
have some resources. You have knowledge, skills, and abilities
and you have some time you can spend on work. Thus you need to decide on the way most beneficial
for you to employ these resources. There are two options here: working for a
company or starting one. Your potential earnings should help you decide
on that. Will you earn more by working on your own
than by getting a job? Let us take an example. Jack is a physical worker. He can either operate a construction machine,
or use his own physical strength to get the job done. Jack knows that the best career path for him
is doing physical work. Now assume that the current market pay for
digging a one meter deep ditch is 10 dollars. Jack is faced with a decision. He can try to secure some orders for ditch
digging by himself, or he can get a steady job at a construction company. With his trusty shovel by his side, he can
dig 5 ditches a day, so he would earn 1000 dollars a month working Monday to Friday. The construction company has an excavator
which Jack can use to dig 30 ditches per day, but the company is prepared to pay only 5
dollars per ditch to a worker, while keeping the rest. On the company’s payroll Jack would earn
3000 dollars. Moreover, unlike Jack, the construction company
already has a nice market position and a customer base, so it would take a lot of his work only
to catch up with that. And remember that he is less effective at
digging than the excavator. Can we assume that the construction company
is exploiting Jack by taking away 50% of his work’s worth? But if not for the company, Jack would earn
even less. He lacks the capital needed to increase his
efficiency, and his low potential earnings make it harder for him to save up and invest
in buying his own excavator. Working for a company already endowed with
capital improving his productivity gives Jack a chance for a better life. No rational man like Jack would take such
a job knowing that he can earn more on his own. Thus, unless an employer finds a way to multiply
the value of his employee’s work beyond that of his potential earnings while self-employed,
the employer cannot possibly hire anyone. And the value of work is always multiplied
when used with a helping hand of capital. The capital can be such things as tools, know-how,
or business contacts. It is obvious, however, that the employer
will not employ Jack out of the goodness of his heart alone. The boss’ aim is to put all of this work
to good use, thus turning it into profit. Now let us examine what this desire to use
the work for profit entails. Martin had a steady job for many years. Month by month he saved some of his wages,
sacrificing a potential of a slightly more luxurious life. When he collected 40 000 dollars he took a
grave risk. He left his job and founded a construction
company. He invested his money in tools, a car for
his working team, and in steady salaries for the men he hired. First he took small orders, and his savings
dwindled while his men were getting paid. Initially, he earned less than in his regular
job, but with every satisfied client he got more orders, and after some time he even started
seeing some profits. He continued to consume less than he earned,
and was thus able to reinvest his money into his business by training his employees and
buying better tools for them. After a few years he had a good market position
and decided that it was time to expand. He took another risk loaning money to buy
heavy construction equipment, including the very excavator which later got Jack a job. Notice how Martin did not get it all for free. At first, for many years he had to abstain
from consumption and thus save money. Then he took a great risk and left his comfortable
and steady job to start a business. Were he to fail, he would not only lose his
entire savings, but his job as well. He was willing to do all of these things just
because he hoped for a future profit. It was this very hope that kept him going. Without this chance for higher future earnings
he would probably never left his previous job. It is so easy to create jobs for their own
sake. You just need to prohibit the use of all construction
machinery. Then you will have to replace one excavator
operator with ten people working shovels. You can also spend millions of taxpayers’
dollars on workers who will dig trenches, and then more millions on other people filling
those trenches up. But it is evident that this is a pure waste
of resources that could otherwise be put to a good use. All work is futile unless it adds value. We have already discussed in our video “That
Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen” how the government is incapable of creating
new jobs. It can only shuffle them around. Roughly speaking, for every job created by
the government we lose a potential job in the private sector. And those jobs supposedly created by the government
often add no value whatsoever to society. One convincing example is excessive bureaucracy. So what can government do to actually create
more jobs? If what creates jobs is a hope for higher
future profits, then the government needs only to abstain from interfering with employment
of accumulated capital, and with profit realization. The government should refrain from taxing
high profits not to discourage profitable activities of entrepreneurs. And also it should stop pulling away accumulated
capital from its most productive uses. The government should also stop making it
more expensive for entrepreneurs to hire people. If a workplace costs more money than it brings,
then it will not be created. It is also important for the government not
to cause inflation by interfering with interest rates, as it discourages savings. All in all, the best thing the government
can do for the labor market is to step aside and allow the entrepreneurs to act.

You May Also Like

About the Author: Oren Garnes

27 Comments

  1. I just found ur channel
    Checking out all ur videos they r amazing
    Keep up the great work
    Btw I asked u in my last comment
    Which animation software u use
    Other channels like practical psychology and fight mediocrity use video scribe
    But
    This is not video scribe
    Wht is it?

  2. This is such a fantastic channel! It is a travesty that you are not much bigger. Once thing that would be good is a better quality mic but other than that I feel I could be watching a channel with millions of subs

  3. I disagree with you on the interest rates…lowering interest rates discourages people to save (I agree), but it discourages people to have their money sitting in a bank, so instead they decide to spend it (increasing consumer spending, the velocity of money, and thus stimulating the economy) or invest it which further stimulates the economy.

  4. How cute, cartoon Propaganda to bad it's 75 percent incorrect. If the government taxes profit that encourages businesses to spend on labor expansion and equipment to avoid the tax on profit. Even an ignorant idiot knows that.

  5. You are completely right- employers are demanding so much from employees we are at breaking point. It is carnage out there.

  6. This channel has a stong anarcho capitalist bent and I like it ?✌?. I've subbed and enabled the bell icon (first time ever for the bell)

  7. OF COURSE the construction company is exploiting the worker.
    A worker coop does the EXACT SAME as a capitalist owned company, but pays ALL it's profit to the workers.
    Worker coops are in fact WAY more profitable than capitalist enterprises, simply because they do not have share holders sitting above the workers, sucking profit out of the workers without ever contributing any work themselves.
    Worker coops are even WAY more advanced than capitalist enterprises, so much so that Microsoft rents lab time at the university of Mondragon, because the labs at Mondragon are so advanced that Microsoft cannot even dream of building something like that.

  8. I didn't know private sector created nasa and infrastructures I thought it was this inefficient government? ?

  9. Your rationale for refuting the socialist argument that wage labour is exploitation is laughable. The very fact that the employee is too poor to own his own excavator, thus he chose to rent himself to a richer man, is proof that he's being exploited. You using it to prove that he's not being exploited is beyond ridiculous. You also mention that it's much more practical than shoveling away until he can afford to buy his own excavator (which is basically the same argument). Well, sure, but the fact that he can do much worse (i.e. Starving or shoveling) does not at all diminish the fact that richer man is exploiting the fact that the poorer man does not have the means that he has.

  10. How about automation and artificial intelligence which are replacing and competing against human labour in many sectors ? In your video, Martin could deploy robots; instead of hiring Jack and other diggers.

  11. i know most of the things that u said was totally right,
    but that awesome guitar tune in the background took all of my attention in the first place.

  12. The proposed solution seem to not adress the issue, that the company needs to have an ever increasing profit to satisfy investors (the guys who lent and keep lending money to Mark to get all the construction machines). Meanwhile the available laborers only increase in numbers as the total population grows and automation takes over.

    What is good for companies aren't necessarily good for the populace.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *